Verde Valley Medical - Annual Machine Solutions

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Amazing Grapes | Yellow Pages | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state July 24, 2014

12/11/2012 3:07:00 PM
Supreme Court delays Arizona domestic benefits question

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX -- Arizona will have to continue providing benefits to the domestic partners of its gay state and university employees, at least for the time being.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its last orders of the calendar year on Monday. And Arizona's bid to have the justices take up the question was nowhere on the list.

But the delay in resolving the case is likely to be even longer than just January.

Last week the court opted to hear two issues related to gay rights: California's Proposition 8 which overturns a state law allowing gays to wed, and the federal Defense of Marriage Act which denies federal recognition to gay couples who marry in states where that is legal.

Tara Borelli of Lambda Legal, which sued the state in a case called Diaz, said that inaction is significant.

"Given that the Supreme Court didn't issue any order in any direction in Diaz, we believe that they will hold the case until they have issued a decision in the Proposition 8 case and the DOMA case that they accepted for review,' she said. "And that is anticipated to be sometime in June of 2013.'

Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne conceded Monday that the decision to take the other cases -- but not the one he wants the high court to review -- suggests the justices are not interested in ruling on his issue at this point.

"The probability is, they won't take it,' he said, at least not now.

Borelli said once there is a ruling on the other two cases she expects the justices to send the Arizona case back to lower courts to reconsider, this time with the benefit of a ruling on the rights of gays.

In the interim, though, a personnel rule changed pushed through in 2008 by then Gov. Janet Napolitano entitling the partners of gay employees to get benefits remains in effect.

Alan Ecker, spokesman for the state Department of Administration, said there are currently 132 state workers who are getting benefits for their partners, plus another 98 university employees. He said the cost to taxpayers is currently running close to $1.9 million a year.

Arizona has long provided benefits for the dependents of its workforce.

What the 2008 rule did is redefine who is a "dependent' to include someone living with the employee for at least a year and expected to continue living with that person. It also requires a showing of financial interdependence as well as an affidavit by the employee affirming that there is a domestic partnership.

In 2009, with Napolitano gone to work in the Obama administration, the Republican-controlled Legislature passed a law limiting who can be a dependent, specifically excluding unmarried partners.

Borelli brought a lawsuit challenging the law, but only on behalf of gays. That's because

As approved, the rule contained no reference to the gender of the partner. But the lawsuit challenging it was brought only on behalf of gays because heterosexual employees have a legal option to get benefits: They can marry in Arizona; same-sex couples cannot.

A trial judge enjoined the law as discriminatory, a decision upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That led Horne to ask the nation's high court to intercede and, from his perspective, declare the lower court rulings void.

Borelli said a sweeping ruling by the high court in the Proposition 8 case could have a significant impact on the Arizona lawsuit.

In that case, the 9th Circuit voided a California initiative which overturned a law entitling gays to wed. The court said voters could not take away that right once it had been given.

Borelli said the U.S. Supreme Court could decide that case strictly on California issues. At the same time, she said, the justices could determine there is a federal constitutional right to marry, regardless of whether the partner is of the same or opposite sex.

That latter scenario would change the whole focus of the Arizona case, called "Diaz' for short, after the name of one of the challengers.

"Diaz is really about when a state has set up a roadblock for state employees and has said you can only get coverage for your family if you do this thing that's legally impossible for you, which is to marry,' Borelli explained. "We do think that a broad ruling from the Supreme Court on marriage would change completely the issues in Diaz.'

Borelli said, though, if the Supreme Court upholds Proposition 8, that does not necessarily undermine her case against Arizona. She said it would depend on how broadly the justices reject the 9th Circuit ruling, and on what basis.

Taylor Waste

    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Arizona uses reproductive ability to support gay marriage ban (1 comment)
Letter: Thank you for setting the record straight on Mingus football camp (4 comments)
Christmas parade marshal and theme needed (1 comment)
Angry impasse threatens border solution (6 comments)
Letter: Players attend football camp without a single taxpayer dollar of support (2 comments)

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1700 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - Pulse Research
HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
Eye Boutique of Sedona

© Copyright 2014 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved